Update #6


This has been an intense time for testing the individual components and putting them through their paces.

Our DSP software allows us to rapidly add elements to our program that affect the thump intensity output force, response over frequency ranges, headphone volume and EQ, etc.

This is our current DSP schematic:

DSP schematic

The original BackBeat G1 had a low-pass filter only in the signal chain. This provides a frequency response between approx. 20-200Hz. It also had a natural frequency resonance around 60-80Hz. The rumble response is significantly more pronounced around these frequencies.

For G2, we've included a compressor in the transducer thump chain. Much like a compressor in an audio signal chain, it will smooth out the thump response over a wide frequency range, so the higher resonance levels will be lower, and the lower will be higher. 

EQ setting are also easy with the DSP. We have a low pass filter for the thump response range. We'll also have the future ability (through the app) to change EQ settings. For example, you'll be able to add extra bass in the headphone output if you're using small ear bud headphones.


Programming PCBs

We're close to finishing up our programming testing which involves:

-verifying component functionality.

-programming bootloader and softdevice onto the main BT chip.

-flashing the firmware.

The firmware is the custom software that will make BackBeat function. You will interface with the firmware through the membrane switch buttons and also eventually though the app.

We have also completed the design and are in the middle of constructing the programming and test fixture for the PCB's. This is a HUGE part of the process since the PCB is the brain of the whole unit and this process will ensure the same quality across all boards.


Spring redesign

You may have seen our 3-blade spring design previously. Through our physical testing we could tell there was an issue with the spring around 60Hz. It tended to wobble sideways and not in its intended up-down motion. That wobble caused the magnet to hit the voice coil, making noise and slightly damaging the coil.

We performed a finite element analysis (FEA) of the spring and magnet combination. Sure enough we found a natural modal frequency at 61Hz:

3-blade spring

The solution is quite simple and that's to go to a 4-blade design:


4-blade spring

The only change we need to make is to add a post in the enclosure to accommodate the 4th blade. FEA runs show there aren't any undesirable modal frequencies in G2's operating range. The shape of the enclosure, the magnet, the voice coil all remain the same.


Thats it for now, watch for our next update in a couple of weeks, we have a lot more cool stuff to report!


  • Thanks for the updates. Seems like you want it right before you ship and I’m all about that. No need to get impatient. The features surpass the first version so I’ll wait. I’d rather wait to get the final product than an inferior one.

    Jason David on

  • It’s been two weeks to the day, and no response. I can deal with pretty much anything with open/honest communication. This situation is nearing an impasse. Please quite hiding behind the release of amazing technical information that many of us do not know how to use in our performance life (althought I’m extremely greatful for those of you who DO) and answer the question or at least address it. WHEN is a realistic expectation of delivery of the product?

    Jason Smith on

  • i want to know the answer to jason smith’s question

    bob on

  • I really appreciate your transparency during this process. It’s really cool to see what you folks are up to, I have full faith the G2 will be worth the wait! Keep up the good work.

    Nick Cancelmo on

  • I truly appreciate these updates! I placed my original order August 15 of 2021. Can I get a realistic update as to expected delivery time?

    Jason Smith on

Leave a comment

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published